Agilent Technologies

Moat: 3/5

Understandability: 2/5

Balance Sheet Health: 4/5

Agilent Technologies, Inc. is a global leader in life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets, providing application-focused solutions that include instruments, reagents, software, and services.

Investor Relations Previous Earnings Calls


The moat, understandability, and balance sheet health scores reflect a conservative evaluation to ensure a margin of safety in any assessment.

Agilent’s diverse product portfolio and entrenched relationships provide a solid competitive position. However, it’s not immune to competition and shifts in market preferences.

Business Overview

Agilent Technologies operates in three primary segments:

  1. Life Sciences and Applied Markets (LSAG): This segment provides analytical instruments, consumables, and software used in drug discovery, diagnostics, and research. Key products include liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) systems, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) systems, cell analysis tools, and genomics solutions.
  2. Diagnostics and Genomics (DG): This segment is focused on providing products that include genomic assays and diagnostic instruments. Agilent offers both clinical and research applications.
  3. Agilent CrossLab (AC): This segment focuses on providing a portfolio of laboratory services, consumables, and software. It supports customers with lab management, data analytics, and other related services, aiming to enhance efficiency and performance.

Agilent is transitioning from product sales to a more solutions-oriented approach, focusing on recurring revenues and increased customer lifetime value.

Industry Trends

  1. Increasing complexity of research: In the life sciences, technological advancements and increasingly complex research have created a greater need for advanced instruments.
  2. Globalization of the pharmaceutical industry: Biopharma companies are expanding their global footprint, increasing demand in emerging markets and increased need for a vendor like Agilent who can work globally.
  3. Automation and digital transformation: Increasing automation is driving the demand for software and services, in particular for laboratories.
  4. Growth in diagnostics: The market for diagnostics is expected to grow in the next few years.
  5. Sustainability: Environmental regulations are increasing, which benefits companies that offer solutions to environmental testing.
  6. Consolidation: The industry, which includes scientific instrumentation, is being consolidated, with major players acquiring smaller companies. This increases competitive intensity.
  7. Personalized medicine: This creates a need for more flexible and specific testing tools.

Competitive Landscape

Agilent faces competition from several key players, including:

  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: A major competitor that also has analytical instruments, consumables and lab services.
  • Danaher Corporation: The company competes with them in the life science and diagnostic tools segment.
  • Shimadzu Corporation: They are mainly competitors in the high-end analytical instrumentation industry.
  • PerkinElmer, Inc.: A company focused on the applied market space, such as drug testing or research chemicals.
  • Biotech and Diagnostics Companies: These companies, such as Illumina and Roche, also compete with Agilent, specifically in the genomics and diagnostics market.

What Sets Agilent Apart?

  • Broad portfolio: Agilent offers a very broad portfolio, ranging from instruments to consumables, services, and software.
  • Strong installed base: The extensive installed base creates a competitive advantage through repeat customers.
  • Reputation for quality and reliability: Agilent’s products are known for high quality, performance, and reliability.

Financial Performance

  • Recent Results (Q2 FY2024): Agilent reported revenue of $1.6 billion, which was a 2.6% year-over-year decrease. Operating profit was $345 million, or 21.5% of revenue, and net income was $290 million. The company expects Q3 2024 results to be about 1.5 Billion.
  • Revenue Distribution: While Agilent’s revenues are somewhat concentrated in Asia, the company still has revenues coming from multiple sources which increases its overall revenue stability. For FY 2023, the geographical revenue distribution was roughly US (31%) APAC (38%) and Europe (31%).
  • Profitability: The business has historically had healthy gross margins and returns on invested capital, though the latter has declined recently. However, in the long term, they expect ROIC to be more stable. Gross margins have decreased recently to 53.2% in Q2 2024.
  • Cash flow: The company has consistently generated positive free cash flow, which it uses for both R&D and acquisitions, or share repurchases.

Agilent’s operating margins and cash flows are strong, however, recent quarterly revenue declines and increased expenses are causing some concern.

Moat Rating: 3 / 5

Agilent has a notable but not insurmountable moat. Here’s the breakdown:

  1. Intangible assets (Brands and Patents): Agilent has strong brand recognition in the scientific and analytical instrument space. Their large patent portfolio is a moat because of high R&D expenditure. Rating - 3/5:
  2. Switching costs: The high costs associated with training staff on specific systems create a level of customer lock-in. Additionally, the integration of Agilent’s instruments and software into existing workflows makes switching costly and time-consuming for clients. Rating - 4/5:
  3. Cost Advantage: Because of their size, they can leverage better prices for components than smaller rivals. Rating - 3/5.
  4. Network effect: The company does not exhibit a true network effect. However, the amount of data generated in their software does give them a form of increasing returns. - 2/5:
  5. Size Advantage: Agilent is among the largest companies in the industry which provides a benefit. Rating - 3/5:

While the company has a mix of the characteristics mentioned above, its moat isn’t as strong as a business such as Coca Cola which has strong moats based purely on its brand and demand. Agilent needs to constantly innovate to maintain its advantage, since other big companies also compete here.

Legitimate Risks to the Moat and Business Resilience

  1. Technological Obsolescence: The rapid pace of technological change in the scientific instrument sector poses a significant risk. New innovations from competitors could disrupt existing product lines.

  2. Competition: The industry has strong competitors in many different spaces, and they are prone to price and product competition. Additionally, the number of competitors means that the profits for most will be “mean reverting” over the long run.

  3. Economic Cycles and Budget Constraints: Research spending, particularly in government and academia, can be quite cyclical or reduced in a down turn, putting downward pressure on Agilent’s revenues.

  4. Acquisition Integration: Integrating acquisitions, while valuable for growth and new products, can be risky. If done poorly, then it has a possibility of destroying existing value.

  5. Supply chain disruptions: As the world becomes more and more interconnected, there is an increasing risk of disruptions in raw materials.

  6. Reliance on a few products: Although Agilent is relatively diversified, many of their businesses are tied to particular products. These products, which include mass spec, should be very safe over the long-term because of its use in a lot of R&D projects. However, it is possible that the market may not require this in the future.

  7. Reliance on patents: As mentioned previously, they rely heavily on patents to have a competitive advantage. If competitors can devise ways to work around the patents, or the patents fail to protect them, it could harm their moat.
  8. Cybersecurity threats: There is a growing risk for cybersecurity, and the company must make sure that they are well protected.

Management’s Perspective on Recent Challenges

  • During the latest earnings calls, management noted some volatility in customer spending, especially with regards to some large customers in biopharma space. They also noted a slight slowdown in demand in China, due to the economic slowdown in China. However, they mentioned that overall market for instruments has not changed much.
  • They are also trying to improve efficiency and productivity by streamlining operations, and trying to make the company have more recurring revenues over a time.
  • Management has emphasized the strength of their operating cash flows and the company’s commitment to long-term value creation despite the macro challenges.
  • They are cutting costs, as necessary, while also taking advantage of growth opportunities.

Understandability: 2 / 5 Agilent’s business is hard to understand for the layperson. The combination of the nature of its products and services, and the complexity of how it creates a moat means that the understanding level is very difficult. Specifically, the way its moat is formed, through technological patents and strong relationship with customers, makes it tough to predict its long-term growth prospects. Hence, it will not fall under “easy to understand”.

Balance Sheet Health: 4 / 5 Agilent’s balance sheet is in a healthy state, with a good cash balance, which is offset by some debt. While the company has increased its debt over the recent years, it is within the range of companies in the same segment. Additionally, most of its assets, in the form of equipment and investments, have the potential for high returns. In the long term, Agilent’s balance sheet is stable.

  • Current ratio is at ~3, which suggests liquidity.
  • Total debt was at $3.6B as of October 31, 2023, including both short-term and long-term debt. That is relatively low compared to total assets.
  • ROIC (without goodwill) has been around 20%, suggesting that the assets are performing well.

Overall, Agilent is a complex company with a strong moat that is built on advanced technology. It is important that the company continues to innovate, make strategic acquisitions, and maintain relationships to sustain that moat. The future for Agilent looks reasonably promising as long as the management is able to correctly predict the future of scientific development.