PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
Moat: 2/5
Understandability: 3/5
Balance Sheet Health: 3/5
PennyMac Financial Services is a specialty finance company focused on the U.S. residential mortgage market, providing origination and servicing solutions, but it faces considerable competition and economic headwinds that threaten their long term sustainability.
Investor Relations Previous Earnings Calls
The moat, understandability, and balance sheet health scores reflect a conservative evaluation to ensure a margin of safety in any assessment.
Business Overview
PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) operates in the U.S. residential mortgage market, focusing on both mortgage origination and servicing. They offer their services through three channels: Production, which involves the origination and sales of mortgage loans; Correspondent Lending, where they acquire closed loans from other lenders; and Consumer Direct Lending, which involves originating loans directly with consumers. A significant portion of their business is tied to loans that are guaranteed or insured by various government-sponsored entities (GSEs). The company also manages a Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT), which invests in mortgage-related assets.
- Revenue Distribution:
- Production: This segment focuses on the generation and sale of mortgage loans. This is a big chunk of the business but revenues fluctuate based on home buying and selling, interest rate changes, and mortgage refinancing activity.
- Servicing: Servicing revenue comes from fees earned for managing mortgage loans, collecting payments, and handling foreclosures. This area provides steadier income compared to Production but still subject to changes in delinquencies and loan prepayments.
- Investment Management: This is the segment that manages PMT, which generates investment income based on the performance of mortgage-related assets. The income here is subject to market dynamics and credit risk.
-
Industry Trends: The mortgage industry has experienced considerable volatility recently. The prevailing higher interest rates have dampened loan origination demand and increase prepayment rates. Moreover, the rise in inflation and risk of recession adds to the uncertainty in the market. The industry is also seeing a regulatory push for higher liquidity and risk-based requirements for companies involved in the market. This is making it hard for smaller, thinly capitalized companies to operate.
-
Competitive Landscape: PFSI operates in a highly competitive market with many banks and independent mortgage originators. Competition is fierce on pricing and the level of service provided. Large banks, especially the big ones in the industry and credit unions have huge advantages due to their better funding costs (access to depositor funds) and stronger relationships with borrowers (existing clients of the bank). Competition for correspondent lending is also intense, because the rates and costs to maintain these loans is pretty standard across the market.
- What Makes PMFS Different:
- Strong presence in the correspondent lending channel. PennyMac is a leader in this channel which offers a stable pipeline of loan flow, where they can buy loans from other institutions. This is less capital intensive than going direct to consumers (their Direct Lending arm) and less risky to them than managing a big team of loan officers (their Production arm).
- Focus on technology: They try to improve the entire process through technology enhancements to reduce friction for their operations and improve client experience. However, tech improvements are easily replicable by the competition.
- Servicing capability: The company has a robust servicing arm that generates predictable cash flows and enables the company to weather a downturn in originations. But they can also experience large losses due to foreclosures in economic downturns.
- What Makes PMFS Different:
- Recent Concerns/Controversies/Problems
* **Interest rate risk** Higher interest rates are decreasing refinance volumes and are impacting affordability for prospective homebuyers.
* **Intense competition**: Increased competition for originations puts pressure on pricing and profitability.
* **Credit risk**: A worsening economic outlook could lead to higher delinquency rates and credit losses.
* **Regulatory changes**: New regulations relating to higher capital requirements and risk management can increase costs.
Management Perspective: Management believes that their scale, efficiency and technology investments will allow them to navigate the changing landscape and continue to create shareholder value. During their earnings calls, there has been significant emphasis on their ability to adapt to changes in interest rates. Also, that their servicing and investment management segments are well equipped to weather downturns in originations. However, their focus remains mostly on the “long term”.
Financial Analysis
- Revenue: Revenue for PMFS is highly cyclical, as is driven primarily by originations, which are heavily influenced by interest rate cycles. Lower rates result in higher origination revenue through increased refinance activity. The last year has seen revenue contract heavily as rates rose due to the fed, and now the revenue is recovering slightly as rates remain high. Management believes that this is the new normal, and expect rates to remain higher for longer.
- Profitability: Profit margins are also cyclical, since lower interest rates create a competitive environment for more loans and consequently decreases margins (through price compression). The increased rate environment should be beneficial to profit margins, as competition wanes due to the high rates. ROIC has typically been around 15% over long periods of time, which is very good, but is also highly volatile. Their profit margins for loan originations are typically around 3.5%.
- Balance Sheet: The company has shown significant increases in liabilities in 2022 due to decreases in fair market value of MBS, and has been selling securities to maintain required cash on hand for liquidity purposes. Additionally, their total equity has increased significantly as well.
- Cash flow: Cash flows are subject to the origination cycle. In recent earnings, PMFS reported negative cash flows from operations due to negative gains on servicing portfolio and other factors. However, they expect to bounce back to positive cash flow in 2023.
- Debt: They tend to carry a lot of debt relative to equity, which can be an issue with a rising rate environment. Their debt levels are primarily dependent on their investment portfolio and can be used for margin or for other working capital needs.
- Capital Allocation: The company has begun to buyback stock after significant declines in stock price, while paying dividends. However, their capital allocation has mainly focused on maintaining the cash flow within the business.
Moat Rating: 2 / 5
PFSI’s competitive advantage is rooted in their extensive distribution network (through correspondents) and data, which allows them to generate decent profitability, but these are easily replicable by competitors and they have a weaker brand than others.
- Network Economics: They have some benefit as they connect many lenders, but the size of the network is not nearly as large or sticky as other companies with stronger network effects.
- Switching Costs: There is little switching cost for brokers to shift between companies. But they are able to retain existing clients through high-quality service and product offerings.
- Intangible Assets: The company has developed a recognized brand in the mortgage space, but its products and services are fairly similar to other competitors.
- Cost Advantages: They are able to control their costs somewhat better than competitors, however, their profit margins are still at or below industry average.
Their moat is mostly a narrow moat based on some scale and efficiencies, but their operations and profitability are still vulnerable to competitive pressures and the macro conditions of the market.
Understandability Rating: 3 / 5
Their basic business model is easy to understand: buy a loan, service a loan, or invest in MBS; but things get more complicated once you dig deep into how the different segments work, the complexities surrounding regulatory requirements, interest rate sensitivity, leverage issues, fair-market value assumptions on their assets, the various risks, etc.
Balance Sheet Health: 3 / 5
While the company has maintained liquidity, their reliance on borrowed funds creates some risk on the balance sheet. There is also a big question mark surrounding the mark to market accounting of their assets (MBS) and how that will be affected if rates keep rising. Given these factors, I rate their balance sheet health at a medium level.